you have gone from muscle mass to muscle strength but strength is different from power and I th issue is power loss , dynapenia. I believe reversing dynopenia. which involves nerve speed, building the number of motor nevrve endplates and synchronizing the firings as in a building demolition. this all takes more specific training and longer training Thant building muscle mass or strength. so how to do this if this is correct.
Great article about HPV, but I never see mention of *men*. What is the cancer risk for men from HPV? And is there a concern for the man if a partner/woman has been diagnosed with HPV and/or abnormal Pap with strains 16 or 18, should certain sexual activities be restricted until the infection clears?
I listened to your podcast about genetics. I had a Complete DNA (formerly Nebula) test from Prophase Labs. It found 2 copies of an MTHFR gene. Following a methylation panel from Genova, I have been taking Homocysteine Resist and have maintained high levels of B12. However, my 56 year-old daughter had been complaining of increasing muscle cramps and tingling in her legs at all times. I asked her to test her B12 since she has at least 1 copy of my MTHFR variant. She did and found that she has a chronic, severe B12 deficiency. Since then she has had B12 shots and now takes folate supplements. She no longer has cramps but had some nerve damage. This is an example of an accidental finding on a whole genome DNA test that had important meaning for my daughter.
Dear Peter and the team, I just came across the news that Australian ECU has made a breakthrough applying AI to detect and quantify abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) on lateral spine images captured by DEXA. Here are several links: https://www.heartfoundation.org.au/catalyst/aac-screening https://nhiri.ecu.edu.au/research/you-aorta-look-beyond-muscle-and-bone-for-falls-and-fracture-risk-new-ai-algorithm-identifies-high-risk-older-women/ It would be really interesting if Peter talks about this on one his AMAs to elucidate the subject.
Would love an updated podcast about Breast Cancer - it's been a few years since you've done one - and there have been so many advancements. Specially around women who have had breast cancer - especially early stages - that go through treatment - surgery, radiation, chemo - etc - but there are so many new hormone therapies that are about to come up - the SERD group - possibly replacing Tamoxifen and AIs. But - as a woman who had early stage breast cancer and is now on Tamoxifen - what lifestyle, supplement, nutrition information can you share to all me/us to go on to lead healthy lives?
What are the systemic effects on cholesterol and insulin resistance for people who have 2 APOE4 alleles? I ask because I have 2 and have unusually high cholesterol, both LDL and HDL, and ongoing insulin resistance regardless of lifestyle measures. I think it is because of this as I have had genetic testing to rule out everything else. I have read studies that suggest having the APOE4 alleles are much more systemic and complicated than just effects are brain tissue but there isn't much mainstream on the topic and I am not by an means an expert on reading and understanding research studies. So I was hoping you might consider a focuses discussion on systemic effects. Thank you.....and not to butter up the request but I have been a member for a while and am part of the Early program. :) Hey its worth a try.
I’m a PhD student in Human Performance and Movement Science with interests in integrative physiology, cardiometabolic disease, and aging-related mechanisms, and I’m trying to decide whether pursuing an MD (vs staying PhD-only) meaningfully improves one’s ability to do translational work in this space. In your experience, does clinical training materially change the kind of research questions, impact, or credibility one can have in longevity and physiology-focused work? Or can a PhD-driven path be equally effective for doing the kind of work you do?
This is more a suggestion for a topic, rather than a question. Having worked in a diagnostic lab, I often think the science behind blood transfusions is vastly underappreciated. Only 1 blood group system is widely known (ABO), but there are >25 that can affect compatibility. Crossmatching blood can be challenging and stressful for lab staff, especially when a patient is 'bleeding out' or a mass trauma event has occurred. Emergency blood can only be given in limited amounts and a sample of the patient's blood must be taken beforehand so they can be typed to ensure subsequent units are compatible (not always easy practically or given priority by doctors). Whether or not the patient is female and of childbearing age must be considered. I realise this is somewhat outside Peter's main topics, but relevant to longevity because transfusions show science directly saving life and a relatable real world topic, especially since it relies on donated blood (it is hard to envisage synthetic blood products ever being invented). The rationale for athletes having transfusions is also interesting. The frenetic activity inside a diagnostic lab is never seen by patients which is a shame since scarcely any medical decision is made without reference to tests results and blood transfusions are a crucial part of modern medicine with a fascinating history.
Hello Peter and the team! I wonder if you would consider making an episode about hunting. I'm always intrigued when it is mentioned. Perhaps "how to start" or "how to experience". I'm curious what sort of skills, knowledge and fitness a person needs to gain to be able to try to go hunting with a guide or on their own. Thanks for consideration!
I'm curious to hear a science based analysis of the impact of running and weight lifting on joint health. Are there studies that show the impact of running on long term joint health. Also interested in any other data on the specific health benefits or drawbacks of marathon training. Love the show.
Let's say you've received an elevated CAC CT Score that places you in the moderate risk category. What now? Essentially the same as you've already recommended for prevention? Or are there additional considerations or goals that should be met to drive down future risk? Can future risk still be mitigated?
Many patients now take Zepbound by the vial and dispense their own shots. In the online community many patients take the whole vial, not just the 5mg in the vial. There is about 6.4mg in the vial. Thus the actual dosage taken by the patients can be more than the prescribed amount. Do we know of any dangers associated with this common practice?
I've been listening to the podcast for perhaps 5 years. You've done a great job talking about HRT and testosterone and how women can minimize the negative effects of menopause. But for many women who have survived hormone-positive breast cancer (admittedly a minority of the population but still a sizable group), HRT isn't on the table. For these women, besides vaginal creams like estradiol, is there nothing they can do to combat the consequences of menopause? For example, pt had breast cancer when she was 39. Her dr recommended that her ovaries be removed. She has basically been in menopause for years and is now in late forties. Her sex drive is essentially zero, though she doesn't want it to be. Her doctor won't give her testosterone because the dr is afraid it will convert to estrogen. But she takes Letrozole. I saw a recent NIH study that suggests perhaps Aromatase inhibitors (like Letrozole) could be used to mitigate this fear. Do you have any thoughts on that? Is that something these patients can take or is it just too risky?
Hi, I am a 56 year old male, pretty fit (I can run at least 3km in 12 minutes => VO2max 56+). My maximum observed heart rate is around 165, maybe 170 if really pushed. Based on Peter's RPE guidance, I can be in Zone 2 and conversing well up to 145, maybe even 150bpm. This seems a very high % of maximum HR (85%+) compared to everything I see online. Is this realistic?