When Peter talks about ASCVD as being #1 horseman of death, I wonder how often "heart disease" is listed on death certificates due to lazy or inaccurate knowledge of the actual cause. Estimates are that 33% are inaccurate. So has Peter and the research team ever questioned the accuracy of the statistics? I don't think it would change the overall objectives or strategies, but I find it troubling to know that the accuracy of death certificates is so poor and fraught with error. So it seems likely that "heart disease" is probably the "go-to" for most coroners and poorly trained MDs. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4504663/ "Despite the importance of accurate death certification, errors are common. Studies at various academic institutions have found errors in cause and/or manner of death certification to occur in approximately 33% to 41% of cases, with disproportionate overrepresentation of cardiovascular causes of death." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15464706/ https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/well/death-certificate-cause.html
In your recent podcast rebroadcast with Robert Sapolsky, Peter mentions a story about how he hadn’t eaten for >24hr yet his glucose was still elevated. I was wondering if you could please explain the mechanics of how this is possible? I’m not a medical professional. I would think that your glycogen stores are exhausted after a few hours so where does the glucose come from? I wanted to post this question in the comments to the podcast episode but the comments field was closed. Thank-you so much!! Understanding this really helps to think about how to manage healthy glucose levels. :)
If one was to perform whole-body weight training with supersets (squats with pull-ups, deadlifts with push-ups, jumps with abs, etc.) and maintain a heart rate throughout the workout that was equal to Zone 2 heart rate, would this provide the same cardiometabolic benefits as more classic dedicated zone 2 cardio training (cycling)? I have to think it would, which could be a wonderful tool to target strength, hypertrophy, and cardiorespiratory fitness all at the same time for someone who is time crunched. Thoughts?
How would one live their life (in broad strokes) if the goal was to win the centenarian olympics yet never set foot in a gym. For context I have been a weightlifter my entire life and am just feeling burnt out by the gym. Life has too much to offer to spend so many hours in a gym. The outside is calling. If we model our movements and lifestyles around “ancestral health” (whatever that actually means), what would it look like?